CCRJ | Coombe, Curry, Rich, Jarvis
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Team
      • Coombe, Daniel Robert
      • Curry-Jahn, Jill A.
      • Rich, Gregg
      • McMichael, Anne K.
      • Markusson, Dennis Hart
      • Schroer, Robb
      • Feild, Allyson P.
      • Thrailkill, Alexandra
      • Delaney, Ali
      • Cutter, Gabriel
      • Protz, Emily
      • Jarvis, H. Keith (Retired)
      • Rachael E. Gessert Esq.
  • Practice Areas
    • Appellate Law
    • Business Law
    • Insurance Defense
    • Family Law
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate
    • Construction Law
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Blog
  • Payment
  • Contact
Please Call For An Initial Consultation 303-572-4200
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Team
      • Coombe, Daniel Robert
      • Curry-Jahn, Jill A.
      • Rich, Gregg
      • McMichael, Anne K.
      • Markusson, Dennis Hart
      • Schroer, Robb
      • Feild, Allyson P.
      • Thrailkill, Alexandra
      • Delaney, Ali
      • Cutter, Gabriel
      • Protz, Emily
      • Jarvis, H. Keith (Retired)
      • Rachael E. Gessert Esq.
  • Practice Areas
    • Appellate Law
    • Business Law
    • Insurance Defense
    • Family Law
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate
    • Construction Law
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Blog
  • Payment
  • Contact
CCRJ | Coombe, Curry, Rich, Jarvis

A Full-Service Civil Law Firm With Over 30 Years Of Experience

  1. Home
  2.  — 
  3. Firm News
  4.  — 
  5. Coombe and Rich win Summary Judgment for General Contractor

Coombe and Rich win Summary Judgment for General Contractor

On Behalf of Coombe, Curry, Rich, Jarvis | Jan 15, 2016 | Firm News

CCRJ has secured momentous victory for Builders and Construction Professionals in Colorado. In short, CCRJ was able to secure Summary Judgment for its client, a general contractor, against the owner/developer of a multi building senior living facility. CCRJ’s client had over $8,000,000.00 in damages allocated to it.

In sum, CCRJ motioned for Summary Judgment on behalf of its client the general contractor on the basis that its contract with the owner altered the accrual/trigger date for the applicable statute of limitations, and consequently under the facts of the case Plaintiff’s claims were time barred. Plaintiff argued in response that the contractual alteration of the statute of limitations was void pursuant to Colorado’s Homeowner Protection Act (C.R.S. 13-20-806(7)). The Court found that the HPA did not apply in this case because the senior living facility was determined to be a commercial (as opposed to residential) project. As such, the contractual alteration of the accrual/trigger date for the statute of limitations was enforced and Plaintiff’s claims were time barred. This is a significant victory for Colorado’s builders.

Recent Posts

  • 3 reasons to consider mediation for a Colorado divorce
  • 3 critical estate planning updates to make after remarrying
  • The importance of regular estate planning reviews and updates
  • What is mediation in divorce proceedings?
  • Tips to work through probate in Colorado

Categories

  • Business Law News
  • Construction Law News
  • Estate Planning
  • Estate Planning News
  • Family Law News
  • Firm News
  • Insurance Defense News

Archives

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Life is too short to worry. Let us work for you.

Get Started Today

CCRJ | Coombe, Curry, Rich, Jarvis

Office Address

2000 S Colorado Blvd
Tower 2, Suite 1050
Denver, Colorado 80222
  Denver Law Office

Phone Number

303-572-4200
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2026 Coombe, Curry, Rich, Jarvis • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

Review Us
Review Us

© 2026 Coombe, Curry, Rich, Jarvis • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

303-572-4200

 Email